Romantic intensity expresses the momentary value of acute emotions.Romantic profundity embodies frequent acute occurrences of intense love over long periods of time, along with a life experience that resonates in all dimensions, helping the individuals flourish and thrive.Romantic profundity involves shared activities which fulfill essential needs that foster a couple's long-term flourishing.Tags: Research Paper About PovertyHow To Write An Essay WritingCover Letter For Economic Research AnalystEssay About Student'S School SuccessLight On Yoga Book ReportEssays On The Existence Of Aliens
I believe that all of the above objections can be met once we distinguish between intense and profound love.
Establishing the Connection Iris Murdoch Establishing the connection between love and marriage requires the distinction between the acute emotion of intense passionate love and the different sentiment of profound love.
The issue of whether to leave a marriage in which love is not passionate becomes alarmingly central for many couples, and romantic compromises become a major concern.
Objections to the Connection Max Kauffman There are two major types of objections to considering love as the essence of marriage: 1.
Raquel Welch The notion that "love and marriage go together like a horse and carriage" is still widespread, but the arguments against it are gaining strength.
Addressing such arguments requires clarifying what we mean by profound love.But only rarely in history has love been seen as the main reason for getting married.” Coontz further argues that "in many cultures, love has been seen as a desirable outcome of marriage but not as a good reason for getting married in the first place." Similarly, Pascal Bruckner (2013) argues that in the past, marriage was sacred, and love, if it existed at all, was a kind of bonus.Now that love has come to be seen as essential in marriage, love is perceived as sacred, and marriage as secondary.Accordingly, the number of marriages has been declining, while divorces, unmarried partners, and single-parent families are increasing.Bruckner notes that love has triumphed over marriage, but now may be destroying it from within.However, when long-term considerations of profundity are taken into account, the decision will typically prove to be a romantic disaster, involving misery and the feeling of having made a romantic compromise.Love should have a central place in our life and our decision to marry or enter into other types of committed relationships.Indeed, throughout history, marriage has been regarded as a kind of "deal" that should improve, or at least not harm, either person's status or economic wealth.(For this reason, despite a variety of stories on the Cinderella theme, marrying "below oneself" has typically been infrequent.) Marrying for love may make a person blind to these additional aspects—there's a saying that, "He who marries for love has good nights and bad days." Coontz notes that the Enlightenment gave rise to the view that "love developed out of admiration, respect, and appreciation of someone's good character." Socioeconomic considerations are related to all kinds of external circumstances that carry weight in the decision to get married.Marriage is a framework of living that includes other important factors besides love. Passionate love is a relatively short-term experience in our lives, and so the long-term aspects of love are of greater importance.The first set of objections indicates that marriage is a social framework that exists within certain socioeconomic circumstances—and that the well-being of the couple requires this fact to be taken into account.