Tags: Essays Organizational ChangeSolving Word Problems WorksheetsFootwear Business PlanScore.Com Business PlanSchool For Creative WritingCorporate Business Plans
Abortion is a controversial subject that has been continually argued over for the last 30 years.
This view also brings the challenge whether the government should have power over decisions like this.
Most of our decisions are based on our moral values since “our values shape our thoughts, feelings, actions, and perceptions” (Velasquez 431).
This argument is developed in Beckwith (2007), and in George and Tollefsen (2008).
This presentation here is based on Beckwith’s emphasis that fetuses and the adults they often later become are the “same being.” These arguments, however, can be interpreted in a more complex way, in which we understand them as arguing that having rights, or the properties that result in having rights, is to human beings, meaning that we have rights whenever we exist (and so since a fetus and the later adult are the “same being” they have rights whenever they exist).
So until fetuses can be removed from women and placed in new wombs, abortion may not violate the rights of fetuses and may be permissible.
The philosophical issue of the moral status of abortion is complex.
, albeit completely dependent beings: what else would they be?
So, abortion involves the intentional killing of a human being.
This more sophisticated argument is not discussed here.
Nathan Nobis is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA USA, and author of many articles on topics in bioethics, including abortion.