Finally, thanks to Topoi’s editor in chief, Fabio Paglieri, for agreeing to publish a broad range of papers across various disciplines.
Why bother to learn more about logic and arguments?
Even if they are unfamiliar with logic, many people will realize that there is something wrong with some fallacious arguments without being able to identify the fallacy involved.
A second and closely related benefit will be an improved ability to evaluate the arguments of others.
) has aptly stated that “[v]irtually everyone would agree that a primary, yet insufficiently met, goal of schooling is to enable students to think critically” (p. Indeed, particularly the heuristics and biases-program in experimental psychology, but also anecdotal evidence from industry, support the view that humans by and large manage, and can even strive, improvements may be reliably brought about is far less readily had.
Nor will this surprise, for those seeking to design requisite CT-curricula must currently find the sound part of the evidential basis in support of teaching methods that reliably ameliorate the to be embarrassingly thin.
Through enhancing the original’s reliability and increasing its ecological validity, it recommends itself as an improved alternative for purposes of assessing an individual’s level of epistemological understanding.
Deploying a model of strategic reasoning—called ‘heuristic rhetoric’—in “Cicero on Pompey’s Command: Heuristic Rhetoric and Teaching the Art of Strategic Reasoning” demonstrates the model’s merits in view of a paradigmatic textual example from the rhetorical tradition that can serves in contemporary classrooms not only to teach argumentation skills, but also to improve students’ recognition of fallacies and to increase their awareness of an audience’s biases.
Does it really matter and does it really help anyone?
As a matter of fact, yes it does—and there are several good reasons to take the time to learn more about both topics.