Your thesis statement is the statement that "tells them what you're going to tell them." What is your overall argument about bullying? Then you start proving that argument with the essay.
Our certified Educators are real professors, teachers, and scholars who use their academic expertise to tackle your toughest questions. Supreme Court to allow lower court rulings permitting gay marriage in a number of states to stand provides a useful basis from which to contemplate a thesis statement supporting the right of homosexuals to marry.
He vetoed a bill legalizing same-sex marriage and signed a bill enacting a gay-friendly public school tolerance curriculum in the same month. Although the 2015 Supreme Court decision mandated that all states permit same-sex marriage, many have not relaxed their laws prohibiting same-sex adoption regardless of whether the prospective parents are married.
It's unclear what possible relationship fostering might have with same-sex marriage, or at least why such a relationship should be given any more weight than any other. population identifies as lesbian or gay, and if half of lesbians and gay men exercise their right to get married, that's only a 2 percent increase in the national marriage rate. This is the only argument on the AFA list that doesn't strain credulity. to the finish line on this issue, legalizing same-sex marriage a full 10 years earlier in 2005.
Girls that grow up without a father are “much more likely to experience early puberty and a teen pregnancy” (“Ten Arguments from Social Science Against Same-Sex Marriage”).
In contrast, girls who grew up with an intact family are much less likely to suffer from such things.
We celebrate it, sometimes mourn it, and even argue vehemently over it. No one can agree when it comes to the rights of marriage.
Same-sex couples claim it is an unalienable right for them to marry. Same-sex marriage should not be legalized due to its harmful effects on societal order, the Constitution, and traditional religious values.
There are generally two approaches to the issue of gay marriage, legal and moral, and both have plenty of partisans and detractors.
The Court’s earlier decision (, June 26, 2013) rejecting as unconstitutional Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (Public Law 104-199), which established in law that “the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife,” represented a serious setback for opponents of gay marriage, and this week’s ruling further buttresses the legal arguments by gay marriage proponents or supporters.